In the branch of abstract algebra called ring theory, the double centralizer theorem can refer to any one of several similar results. These results concern the centralizer of a subring S of a ring R, denoted CR(S) in this article. It is always the case that CR(CR(S)) contains S, and a double centralizer theorem gives conditions on R and S that guarantee that CR(CR(S)) is equal to S.

Statements of the theorem

edit

Motivation

edit

The centralizer of a subring S of R is given by

Clearly CR(CR(S)) ⊇ S, but it is not always the case that one can say the two sets are equal. The double centralizer theorems give conditions under which one can conclude that equality occurs.

There is another special case of interest. Let M be a right R module and give M the natural left E-module structure, where E is End(M), the ring of endomorphisms of the abelian group M. Every map mr given by mr(x) = xr creates an additive endomorphism of M, that is, an element of E. The map r → mr is a ring homomorphism of R into the ring E, and we denote the image of R inside of E by RM. It can be checked that the kernel of this canonical map is the annihilator Ann(MR). Therefore, by an isomorphism theorem for rings, RM is isomorphic to the quotient ring R/Ann(MR). Clearly when M is a faithful module, R and RM are isomorphic rings.

So now E is a ring with RM as a subring, and CE(RM) may be formed. By definition one can check that CE(RM) = End(MR), the ring of R module endomorphisms of M. Thus if it occurs that CE(CE(RM)) = RM, this is the same thing as saying CE(End(MR)) = RM.

Central simple algebras

edit

Perhaps the most common version is the version for central simple algebras, as it appears in (Knapp 2007, p.115):

Theorem: If A is a finite-dimensional central simple algebra over a field F and B is a simple subalgebra of A, then CA(CA(B)) = B, and moreover the dimensions satisfy

Artinian rings

edit

The following generalized version for Artinian rings (which include finite-dimensional algebras) appears in (Isaacs 2009, p.187). Given a simple R module UR, we will borrow notation from the above motivation section including RU and E=End(U). Additionally, we will write D=End(UR) for the subring of E consisting of R-homomorphisms. By Schur's lemma, D is a division ring.

Theorem: Let R be a right Artinian ring with a simple right module UR, and let RU, D and E be given as in the previous paragraph. Then

.
Remarks
  • In this version, the rings are chosen with the intent of proving the Jacobson density theorem. Notice that it only concludes that a particular subring has the centralizer property, in contrast to the central simple algebra version.
  • Since algebras are normally defined over commutative rings, and all the involved rings above may be noncommutative, it's clear that algebras are not necessarily involved.
  • If U is additionally a faithful module, so that R is a right primitive ring, then RU is ring isomorphic to R.

Polynomial identity rings

edit

In (Rowen 1980, p.154), a version is given for polynomial identity rings. The notation Z(R) will be used to denote the center of a ring R.

Theorem: If R is a simple polynomial identity ring, and A is a simple Z(R) subalgebra of R, then CR(CR(A)) = A.

Remarks
  • This version can be considered to be "between" the central simple algebra version and the Artinian ring version. This is because simple polynomial identity rings are Artinian,[1] but unlike the Artinian version, the conclusion still refers to all central simple subrings of R.

von Neumann Algebras

edit

The Von Neumann bicommutant theorem states that a *-subalgebra A of the algebra of bounded operators B(H) on a Hilbert space H is a von Neumann algebra (i.e. is weakly closed) if and only if A = CB(H)CB(H)(A).

Double centralizer property

edit

A module M is said to have the double centralizer property or to be a balanced module if CE(CE(RM)) = RM, where E = End(M) and RM are as given in the motivation section. In this terminology, the Artinian ring version of the double centralizer theorem states that simple right modules for right Artinian rings are balanced modules.

Notes

edit
  1. ^ They are full matrix rings over polynomial identity division rings, according to Rowen (1980, p. 151)

References

edit
  • Isaacs, I. Martin (2009), Algebra: a graduate course, Graduate Studies in Mathematics, vol. 100, Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society, pp. xii+516, ISBN 978-0-8218-4799-2, MR 2472787 Reprint of the 1994 original
  • Knapp, Anthony W. (2007), Advanced algebra, Cornerstones, Boston, MA: Birkhäuser Boston Inc., pp. xxiv+730, ISBN 978-0-8176-4522-9, MR 2360434
  • Pierce, Richard S. (1982) Associative Algebras, § 12.7 The Double Centralizer Theorem, page 231, Graduate Texts in Mathematics # 88
  • Rowen, Louis Halle (1980), Polynomial identities in ring theory, Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 84, New York: Academic Press Inc. [Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Publishers], pp. xx+365, ISBN 0-12-599850-3, MR 0576061

📚 Artikel Terkait di Wikipedia

Centralizer and normalizer

theory, the centralizer of a subset of a ring is defined with respect to the multiplication of the ring (a semigroup operation). The centralizer of a subset

Schur–Weyl duality

general linear groups. Schur–Weyl duality can be proven using the double centralizer theorem. Consider the tensor space C n ⊗ C n ⊗ ⋯ ⊗ C n {\displaystyle

Richard S. Pierce

development follows the Jacobson density theorem, the Skolem–Noether theorem, and the double centralizer theorem. The book is dedicated to Marilyn Pierce

Balanced module

this way. In the language of centralizers, a balanced module is one satisfying the conclusion of the double centralizer theorem, that is, the only endomorphisms

Glossary of ring theory

example, the centralizer of the ring itself is the centre of the ring. 2.  The double centralizer of a set is the centralizer of the centralizer of the set

Sporadic group

M: B or F2 has a double cover which is the centralizer of an element of order 2 in M Fi24′ has a triple cover which is the centralizer of an element of

Lyons group

that a centralizer of one of its involutions was the perfect double cover of the alternating group A8. This suggested considering the double covers of

Rudvalis group

symmetric groups. Parrott (1976) characterized the Rudvalis group by the centralizer of a central involution. Aschbacher & Smith (2004) gave another characterization